New Order - BBC Radio | Live in Concert (Fuel 2000)
The value of New Order's Live in Concert lies in its character as a
live album. Now, that may seem obvious, given that it is a live
album. However, what may be less obvious is what exactly is the value of
live albums. For the conscientious collector, it is likely that they
already own versions of the songs contained on the live album, perhaps
even multiple versions. Thus, the value of a live album cannot lie in the
songs it contains. If that is so, then, the value of the album lies in
the difference between previously released versions of the songs on the
live album and their performance in the live setting.
What, then, is the value of a live album which contains previously
released songs in versions substantially similar to the versions contained
on the live album? This is a question that gets to the heart of the
problem of a New Order live album. First, New Order relies on electronics
for a large part of their songs. This means that in the live setting, the
electronic portions of the song may be easily reproduced exactly as they
are in a recorded setting. That is, unlike acoustic instruments, the
performance in a studio is no different from the performance in a live
setting. Second, New Order is frequently characterized as being cold or
emotionless. This means that their songs, when performed live, are not
likely to be injected with a great deal of spunk or vigor. Last, New
Order's songs are meticulous and exact. This means that, when performed
live, they are not likely to be extended into long jams or rave-ups. The
answer to the question of the value of a New Order live album, then, is
not in the difference between the versions on the live album and
previously released albums, but is in the expectation that the versions
will be different.
To illustrate this principle, I will draw upon my own experiences as a New
Order listener and purchaser of the new live album. I have been listening
to New Order for nearly 14 years and have become intimately familiar with
their music. During that period I have come to have great reverence for
what they had released up through 1987: their four outstanding
albums Movement (1981), Power, Corruption and Lies (1983),
Low Life (1985) and Brotherhood (1986) and their array of
non-album singles including but not limited to Thieves Like Us and
True Faith (all collected, along with the album singles, on
Substance (1987)). (Their post-1987 output will not be considered,
because it has been slight and, frankly, not very good. There is hope for
the future, though. See the Chemical Brothers' "Out of Control" from
Surrender, on which Bernard Sumner plays guitar and sings, and
"Brutal," the newest New Order song, on The Beach soundtrack.) What
is apparent from a close study of these releases is that New Order, when
combined with Joy Division, from whose ranks a majority of New Order was
culled, has cast a long shadow over sub-pop music of the last twenty
years: nearly every form of post-punk, techno-pop, new wave, indie, or
electronic artist owes a debt to either New Order, Joy Division, or both
(if you question this, check out the roster on A Means to an End,
the Joy Division tribute from a few years ago, which includes everyone
from Low to Moby to Dave Navarro to Tortoise to Yo La Tengo, and
everything on Warp records).
It is important to note that I came to New Order first and, later, to Joy
Division. This is important because the backwards exposure creates a
distorted perspective of the relationship between the two bands: New Order
appears to be falsely independent from Joy Division. It's difficult to
overcome the primacy of New Order, given that, because they were the first
heard, their music colored my approach to Joy Division. That is, when Joy
Division was first heard, they were measured against New Order and
expectations were based on my exposure to New Order, rather than the other
way around, which would have been proper.
Which brings us back to the question, what is the value of the expectation
that the versions of songs on the live album will be different? First,
the songs are not, largely, different. However, since the listener is not
aware of this, the listener approaches the album with an ear primed for
detecting even the slightest difference. By listening to songs, which
have been heard countless times, under such circumstances, the listener is
given a chance to, in a sense, hear the songs again for the first
time. The listener separates out the various parts--instruments,
melodies, rhythms--closely inspecting each, and pieces them back together
again, understanding them each individually and how they relate to and
interact as a whole. One benefit is a new and greater understanding of
each of the songs. The ultimate benefit, however, now that I am, at
least, as familiar with Joy Division as I am with New Order, is being able
to properly hear the songs as products of the band that was once Joy
Division and grew into being New Order: being able to place the songs in a
proper continuum which begins in as Warsaw in 1977, becomes Joy Division,
and, finally, becomes New Order, through 1987.
The record itself is the entirety of New Order's set at the Glastonbury
Festival, June 19th, 1987. Having just released the True Faith/1963
single, New Order appeared to be getting better and better. However, as it
actually was, they had begun their descent. This collection of songs
could hardly be called their best, or even the most indicative of what New
Order was. Similarly, its hard to believe that this was their greatest
show ever: the performance is very uneven, at times uninspired and nearly
incompetent. Yet, its timing makes it an interesting summation of the path
which New Order had traveled.
The set starts off, poorly enough, with "Touched by the Hand of God," a
mediocre and busy song--too much filler keyboards and not enough melodic
development--whose performance is marred by Sumner's off-key
delivery. Things pick up quickly with a spirited version of "Temptation,"
performed with such exuberance that the mistakes hardly matter. Dancing
sequencers and Peter Hook's unmistakable bass line provide a perfect
foundation, leaving enough space for Sumner's heartfelt vocal delivery and
kooky guitar improv. It's a classic New Order track, balancing mechanics
and precision (Stephen Morris' mechanical drumming blends seamlessly with
the drum machines) with their oddball pop sensibilities. The set takes a
downturn again for "True Faith," which is apologetically introduced as a new
song, setting the listener up for the amateurish performance. Sumner
sings as if he trying to remember what his guitar part is. One questions
whether the band had actually performed this song all together
before. It's a shame to hear a song which, in studio form is so perfectly
executed, being butchered as if by a second-rate cover band.
After that spotty warm up the record really takes off. The remaining
tracks showcase New Order's best elements. "Your Silent Face" highlights
their ability to employ primitive synthesizers to create a full and
compelling song, using a bouncy sequencer and lush washes as the main
melodic elements, meshing the guitar and bass in seemlessly as
accents; this was a song written at a time when preoccupation with the
novelty of technology handicapped most artists attempting to use
keyboards. The extended improv outro on this track feels natural, flowing
out from the band, weightless. "Bizarre Love Triangle" is highly charged,
layering preprogrammed synth upon preprogrammed synth, genius in its
uninhibited excessiveness, forcing the listener to question how cold and
distant New Order really is. Pure new wave.
The key moments, though, come in the final three tracks. First is a
nearly ten-minute version of "Perfect Kiss," which begins identical to the
Low Life album version, with three layers of percussion (hand
played, hi-hat, and super-fake snare and kick), before layering the Hook
bass line and hyper sequencers. The real hook with this song, though, is
the stark contrast between the upbeat disco flavor of the music and the
vaguely despairing vocal delivery, charged as it is with references to Ian
Cutis' suicide. Live, Sumner sounds more pained than on the album version,
and, immediately following the final line, now I know that the perfect
kiss is the kiss of death, he kicks in with an aggressive, distorted
guitar burst. The final two minutes of the song are dominated by his
guitar work, which culminates in a noise that one would never have
expected New Order to make.
In the wake of "Perfect Kiss," all things become clear. The next song, a
charged, almost angry version of "Age of Consent," is straight Joy Division,
built on tribal drumming and driving bass with minimal guitar and
keyboards filling in the spaces where appropriate, culminating in the
stark mantra "I've lost you, I've lost you, I've lost you." However, not even
that channeling of Joy Division can prepare the listener for the final
track, a raucous cover of the Velvet Underground's "Sister Ray" (very similar
to the version that appears on Joy Divison's Still
collection). They ditch the keyboards, stripping the band down to Morris'
cold tom pounding, Hook's throaty bass tone (the one he used in Joy
Division, before moving to the instruments upper register in New
Order), and Sumner's simplistic, repetitive post-punk guitar work.
In the end, the whole song falls apart. However, unlike the messes they
made of songs at the beginning of the set, the destruction of "Sister Ray"
seems more purposeful and appropriate. It's the end of the show, the end
of the night. And perhaps, in those final moments of the song, played by
a band on its decline, was the end of Joy Division.
|